Committee on the Use of Human Subjects in Research (CUHSR)
Human
Subjects Policies
2009-2010 Meeting Dates
- August 28, 2009 - Bradley Hall Room 247
- September 25, 2009 - Bradley Hall Room 247
- October 23, 2009 - Bradley Hall Room 247
- November 20, 2009 - Bradley Hall Room 247
- December 11, 2009 - Bradley Hall Room 247
- January 29, 2010- Bradley Hall Room 247
- February 26, 2010 - Bradley Hall Room 247
- March 26, 2010 - Bradley Hall Room 247
- April 23, 2010 - Bradley Hall Room 247
- May 7, 2010 - Bradley Hall Room 247
Note: New CITI Link
(Select Bradley University as institution affiliation)
Use BU username and
password.
Introduction
and Background (top
of page)
When
human beings are used as subjects in research projects, safeguards must
be established to protect their health, well-being, and rights.
Under the policies established by the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), this protection was extended to all human subjects
regardless of the nature of research being performed. This
protection required that Institutional Review Boards (IRB) at colleges
and universities be established to review and act on all research
proposals involving human subjects. The review board at Bradley is
the University Committee on the Use of Human Subjects in Research (CUHSR).
On January 26, 1981 , HHS revised guidelines and exempted
certain forms of research involving human subjects from review by
Institutional Review Boards. All research must be reviewed by
CUHSR to determine whether it is exempt,
expeditable, or requires full review.
Research Exempt from Full Review by CUHSR
(top of page)
The following are the six categories of exempt
research specified by DHHS.
Category 1 Exemption:
Normal
Educational Practices and Settings
Research conducted in established or commonly accepted
educational settings, involving normal educational practices such as
(i) research on regular and special education instructional
strategies, or (ii) research on the effectiveness of or the
comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom
management methods.
Category 2 Exemption:
Anonymous Educational tests, Surveys, Interviews, or Observations
Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive,
diagnostic, aptitude achievement), survey procedures, interview
procedures, or observations of public behavior, unless: (i)
information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human
subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked
to the subjects, and (ii) any disclosure of the human subjects’
responses outside the research could reasonably place the subjects
at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the
subjects’ financial standing, employability, or reputation.
Category 3 Exemption:
Identifiable Subjects in Special Circumstances
Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive,
diagnostic, aptitude achievement), survey procedures, interview
procedures, or observations of public behavior that is not exempt
under paragraph (b) (2) of this section, if: (i) the human subjects
are elected or appointed public officials or candidates for public
office; or (ii) Federal statues(s) require(s) without exception that
the confidentiality of the personally identifiable information will
be maintained throughout the research and thereafter.
Category 4 Exemption:
Collection or Study of Existing Data
Research involving the collection or study of existing data,
documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens,
if these sources are publicly available or if the information is
recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot
be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the
subjects.
Category 5 Exemption:
Public Benefit or Service Programs
Research and demonstration projects that are conducted by or
subjects to the approval of department or agency heads, and which
are designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine: (i) public
benefit or service programs; (ii) procedures for obtaining benefits
or service under those programs; (iii) possible changes in or
alternatives to those programs or procedures; (iv) possible changes
in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those
programs.
Category 6 Exemption:
Taste and Food Evaluation and Acceptance Studies
Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer
acceptance studies; (i) if wholesome foods without additives are
consumed or (ii) if a food is consumed that contains a food
ingredient at or below the level for a use found to be safe, or
agricultural chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the
level found to be safe, by the Food and Drug Administration or
approved by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food Safety
and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Survey
research and interview procedures involving children are not exempt.
Expeditable Research
(top of page)
Adjunct List of Categories Qualifying for Expedited Review
Category 1
Clinical studies
of drugs and medical devices only when condition (a) or (b) is met, (a)
Research on drugs for which an investigational new drug application (21
CFR Part 312) is not required. (b) Research on medical devices for which
(i) an investigational device exemption application (21 CFR Part 812) is
not required; or (ii) the medical device is cleared/approved for
marketing and the medical device is being used in accordance with its
cleared/approved labeling.
Category 2
Collection of
blood samples by finger stick, heel stick, ear stick, or venipuncture as
follows: (a) from healthy, non-pregnant adults who weigh at least 110
pounds. For these subjects, the amounts drawn may not exceed 550 ml in
an 8 week period and collection may not occur more frequently than 2
times per week; or (b) from other adults and children, considering the
age, weight, and health of the subjects, the collection procedure, the
amount of blood to be collected, and the frequency with which it will be
collected. For these subjects, the amount drawn may not exceed the
lesser of 50 ml or 3 ml per kg in an 8 week period and collection may
not occur more frequently than 2 times per
week.
Category 3
Prospective
collection of biological specimens for research purposes by noninvasive
means, Examples: (a) Hair and nail clippings in a non-disfiguring
manner; (b) Deciduous teeth at time of exfoliation or if routine patient
care indicates a need for extraction; (c) Permanent teeth if routine
patient care indicates a need for extraction; (d) Excreta and external
secretions (including sweat); and (e) uncannulated saliva collected
either in an unstimulated fashion or stimulated by chewing gumbase or
wax or by applying a dilute citric solution to the tongue; (f) Placenta
removal at delivery; (g) Amniotic fluid obtained at the time of rupture
of the membrane prior to or during labor; (h) Supra-and subgingival
dental plaque and calculus, provided the collection procedure is not
more invasive than routine prophylactic scaling of the teeth and the
process is accomplished in accordance with accepted prophylactic
techniques; (i) Mucosal and skin cells collected by buccal scraping or
swab, skin swab, or mouth washings, (j) Sputum collected after saline
mist nebulization.
Category 4
Collection of
data through noninvasive procedures (not involving general anesthesia or
sedation) routinely employed in clinical practice, excluding procedures
involving x-rays or microwaves. Where medical devices are employed, they
must be cleared/approved for marketing. (Studies intended to evaluate
the safety and effectiveness of the medial device are not generally
eligible for expedited review, including studies of cleared medical
devices for new indications.) Examples: a) physical sensors that are
applied either to the surface of the body or at a distance and do not
involve input of significant amounts of energy into the subjects or an
invasion of the subject’s privacy. (b) weighing or testing sensory
acuity; (c) magnetic resonance imaging; (d) electrocardiography,
electroencephalography, thermography, detection of naturally occurring
radioactivity, electroretinoraphy, ultrasound, diagnostic infrared
imaging, Doppler blood flow, and echocardiography; (e) moderate
exercise, muscular strength testing, body composition assessment, and
flexibility testing where appropriate given the age, weight and health
of the individual.
Category 5
Research
involving materials (data, documents, records, or specimens) that have
been collected for any reason or will be collected solely for
nonresearch purposes (such as medical treatment or diagnosis)
Category 6
Collection of
data from voice, video, digital, or image recordings made for research
purposes.
Category 7
Research on group
characteristics or behavior (including, but not limited to, research on
perception, cognition, motivation, identity, language, communication,
cultural beliefs, or practices, and social behavior or research
employing survey, interview, oral history, focus group, program
evaluation, human factors evaluation, or quality assurance
methodologies.
Category 8
Continuing review
of research previously approved by a convened IRB as follows: (a) where
(i) the research is permanently closed to the enrollment of new
subjects; (ii) all subjects have completed all research-related
interventions; and (iii) the research remains active only for the long
term follow-up of subjects; or (b) where no subjects have been enrolled
and no additional risks have been identified or (c) where the remaining
research activities are limited to data analysis.
Category 9
Continuing review
of research not conducted under an investigational new drug application
or investigational drug exemption where categories 2 through 8 do not
apply but the IRB has determined and documented at a convened meeting
that the research involves no greater than minimal risk and no
additional risks have been identified.
Research Requiring Review by CUHSR
(top of page)
CUHSR reviews and has the authority to approve, require
modification (to receive approval) or disapprove all research activities
covered by HHS guidelines. In order to approve a research project,
CUHSR shall determine that all of the following requirements are
satisfied:
- Risks
to the subjects are minimized.
- Risks
to the subjects are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits,
if any, to the subjects, and the importance of the knowledge that
may be reasonably expected to result.
- Selection
of subjects is equitable.
- Informed
consent will be sought from each prospective subject or the
subject's legally authorized representative.
- Informed
consent will be appropriately documented.
- Where
appropriate, there are adequate provisions to protect privacy of
subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of data.
- Where
some or all of the subjects are likely to be vulnerable to coercion
or undue influence, such as persons with acute or severe physical or
mental illness, persons who are economically or educationally
disadvantaged, children, prisoners, and the elderly appropriate
additional safeguards have been included in the study to protect the
rights and welfare of these subjects.
CUHSR shall have
the authority to suspend or terminate approval of research that is not
being conducted in accordance with its requirements or that has been
associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects.
CUHSR
regulations require that research involving any level of deception be followed by an appropriate debriefing of all subjects. Debriefing
procedures should be specified in the CUHSR application form.
General Requirements of Informed
Consent (top
of page)
No
investigator may involve a human being as a subject in research covered
by these regulations unless the investigator has obtained the legally
effective informed consent of the subject or the subject’s legally
authorized representative. An investigator shall seek such consent
only under circumstances that provide the prospective subject or the
representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or not to
participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue
influence. The information given to the subject or the
representative shall be in language understandable to the subject or the
representative. No informed consent, whether oral or written, may
include any exculpatory language through which the subject or the
representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the
subject’s legal rights, or releases or appears to release the
investigator, the sponsor, the institution, or its agents from liability
for negligence.
Basic
elements of informed consent shall include the following:
- A
statement that the study involves research, an explanation of the
purposes of the research and the expected duration of the subject's
participation, a description of the procedures which are
experimental;
- A
description of any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts to
the subject;
- Description
of any benefits to the subjects or to others which may reasonably be
expected from the research;
- A
disclosure of appropriate alternative procedures or courses of
treatment, if any, that might advantageous to the subject
- Statement
describing the extent, if any to which confidentiality of records
identifying the subject will be maintained;
- For
research involving more than minimal risk, an explanation as to
whether any compensation and an explanation as to whether any
medical treatments are available if injury occurs and, if so what
they consist of or where further information may be obtained
- An
explanation of whom to contact for answers to pertinent questions
about the research and research subjects’ rights, and whom to
contact in the event of research-related injury to the subject
- A
statement that participation is voluntary, refusal to participate
will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is
otherwise entitled, and the subject may discontinue participation at
any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is
otherwise entitled.
Where
appropriate, the following elements of informed consent must also be
included:
- A
statement that the particular treatment or procedure may involve
risks to the subject which are currently unforeseeable;
- Anticipated
circumstances under which the subject's participation may be
terminated by the investigator without regard to the subject's
consent;
- Any
additional costs to the subject that may result from participation
in the research;
- The
consequences of a subject's decision to withdraw from the research
and procedures for orderly termination of participation by the
subject;
- A
statement that significant new findings developed during the
research which may relate to the subject's willingness to continue
participation will be provided to the subject; and
- The
approximate number of subjects involved in the study.
CUHSR
has the authority to approve a consent procedure which does not include
or which alters some or all of the previously mentioned elements of
informed consent or waive the requirements for informed consent if,
either:
1.(a) The research involves no
more than minimal risk;
(b) The waiver or alteration does not adversely affect the rights
and welfare of the subjects;
(c) The research could not practically be carried out without
waiver or alteration; and
(d) Wherever appropriate, the subjects will be provided with
additional pertinent information.
OR
2.(a) The research is to be conducted
for the purpose of demonstrating or evaluating:
1. federal, state, or local benefit or service programs which are not
themselves research programs;
2. procedures for obtaining benefits or services under these programs;
or
3. possible changes in or alternatives to these programs or procedures;
and
(b)
The research could not practicably be carried out without the waiver or
alteration.
Documentation of
Informed Consent
(top of page)
Informed
consent shall be documented by the use of a written consent form approved by CUHSR and signed by the subject or the subject’s legally
authorized representative. A copy shall be given to the person
signing the form. See
forms for a model consent form.
Procedure for Committee Review (top
of page)
It
is the responsibility of the investigator (faculty member,
administrator, or student) using human subjects in a covered research
project to submit the appropriate application materials for Committee
review according to the following guidelines:
- Complete
the application form and an appropriate informed consent form.
- Submit
all completed forms to OSP - Bradley Hall, Room 215. During
the current academic year, the Committee will meet monthly.
Application materials must be submitted by 11:00 a.m. on the
Wednesday one week prior to the meeting. Submit
1 copy of all application material to OSP Bradley Hall Room 215.
- Written
responses concerning Committee action and/or approval forms will be
sent to the applicant within one week following final action by the
Committee.
- The
Committee reserves the right to consult with the subject matter,
medical, or legal experts concerning any projects submitted for
review. If expert review of a proposal is deemed necessary by the
Committee, a substantial delay in Committee action should be
anticipated.
- In
the event that a project is denied approval by the Committee, the
applicant will be notified in writing of the reasons for disapproval
and will be given the opportunity to respond in person or in
writing.
- All
research projects that have been approved by the Committee may be
subject to further review or disapproval by appropriate officials of
the University. Projects that have been disapproved by the Committee
may not be subsequently approved by any other University's Officer.
- Major
changes in the research design and/or procedures following Committee
approval must be resubmitted to the Committee as an amended
proposal. In addition, progress reports must be submitted at least
annually and more often if so specified by the Committee.
- Approval
of a project does not remove the researcher's legal responsibility
for the project. The researcher is expected to retain signed
individual informed consent forms for a period of five years. The
Committee's approval of a project constitutes only a statement by
the Bradley Committee that it believes the rights of human beings
will be adequately protected.
- Questions
concerning application procedures and guidelines should be referred
to the Chairperson of CUHSR.
- For
full copy of the policies and procedures see the faculty handbook.
Committee
Members (top of
page)
Dr. Ross Fink,
Chair (2011)
Department of Business Management & Administration
rf@bradley.edu
Dr.
Fran Armmer (2010)
Department of
Nursing
Dr.
Dennis Kroll (2009)
College of Engineering
Dr. Allen Huffcutt
(2009)
Department of
Psychology
Dr.
Andrew Strubhar (2010)
Department of
Physical Therapy
Rev. Brooks McDaniel
(2009)
Illinois
Central
College
Dr.
DeMaris Montgomery (2010)
Department of
Psychology
Dr.
Christopher Rybak
(2011)
Education Leadership and
Human Development
Dr.
Lizabeth Crawford (2010)
Department of
Sociology
David
Sinn, JD (2010)
Heyl
Royster Voelker & Allen
(Alternate)
Dr. Eric Weber
Forms
(MS Word) (top
of page)
Application
Process
Information
and Consent
Continuing
Review
Final Status Report
|